fix(review): format detailed findings as distinct sections - #14048
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Code Review SummaryStatus: No Issues Found | Recommendation: Merge Purely a prompt-template formatting change to the Files Reviewed (2 files)
Reviewed by deepseek-v4.1-flash · Input: 0 · Output: 0 · Cached: 0 Review guidance: REVIEW.md from base branch |
…review-results-formatting
marius-kilocode
enabled auto-merge
September 14, 2026 06:58
eshurakov
approved these changes
Sep 14, 2026
This was referenced Sep 14, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What Problem This Solves
The
/review"Detailed Findings" section rendered every finding as the same undifferentiated bullet list, so consecutive findings ran together and were hard to scan.Why This Change Was Made
Give each finding its own numbered
####heading that restates the severity,file:line, and the short title from theIssues Foundtable.Confidence,Problem, andSuggestioneach start on their own line, and findings are separated by a blank line. The heading cross-references the table row, so the two sections stay in sync.Evidence
Before, all findings shared one bullet ladder:
After, each finding is a distinct section:
No code changes;
review.txtis imported verbatim as the review command prompt.